The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teach me stuff!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Science, Art, and Culture
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
extro…
Guest



PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:43 pm    Post subject: 201 Reply with quote

Some of them glow in the dark.




Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest




PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:29 pm    Post subject: 202 Reply with quote

Revenge most foul!
I really like the way it shows the little guy runnng away from the car. Pretty good assumption that if you ever find yourself shut in the trunk of a car, you gonna want to run like hell if you manage to get out.
Back to top
Doc Borodog
Guest



PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:20 pm    Post subject: 203 Reply with quote

The Most Important Thing You Will Learn Today

Most modern movie theaters have two separate wings, one to the right of the concessions, one to the left. Each wing typically has its own restrooms. Furthermore, movie show times are typically staggered to reduce congestion in the lobby as films end and patrons exit the theaters. If, like me, when you exit the theater you usually have to piss like a racehorse and hate getting caught in the crowd of similarly afflicted exants, proceed immediately to the other wing and use the restroom there, since it is unlikely that a film has just ended there, and there will be no wait. I always do this, and it has never failed me.

You are welcome.
Back to top
Guest




PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:09 pm    Post subject: 204 Reply with quote

Entertain your friends with these stupid quotes.

"Inbreeding is how we get championship horses."
- Carl Gunter, Louisiana state representative, explaining why he was fighting a proposed antiabortion bill that allowed abortion in cases of incest.

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
- Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899.

"The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible."
- Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith's paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service. (Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.)

"Predictions are difficult, especially about the future."
- Yogi Berra, Baseball player

"Yes, maam? Right here, this lady. No, she! Yes, right, second row. Next to the guy in the blue shirt, holding her left hand up. It's a he? Sorry about that. Gotta be careful. I'm very sorry. Go ahead! I'm, excuse me, I'm very sorry. Go, ah, I, a thousand apologies, go ahead."
- George Bush Sr., Former U.S. President, at a press conference

"I have opinions of my own --strong opinions-- but I don't always agree with them."
- George Bush, former U.S. President

"It is white."
- George W. Bush, when asked what the White house was like by a student in East London

"If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by candlelight."
- George Gobel

"I didn't realize I was in a Buddhist temple."
- Al Gore, former U.S. Vice President when asked about his illegal fundraising activities that took place in a Buddhist temple.

"Sure there have been injuries and deaths in boxing - but none of them serious."
- Alan Minter, Boxer

"I favor access to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."
- Ted Kenneday, US Senator

"Did people build this, or did Indians?"
- Tourist question at Mesa Verde National Park
Back to top
Quailman
His Postmajesty



PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:21 pm    Post subject: 205 Reply with quote

I learned something interesting today. Steelhead and Rainbow Trout are the same species. It makes it quite difficult to invoke the Endangered Species Act to protect the steelhead, which can grow to 20 pounds and spends part of its life in the ocean. The rainbow trout on grows to three or four pounds and lives its entire life in fresh water.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MillerTime
Deceased Extra-Terrestrial Member



PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:30 am    Post subject: 206 Reply with quote

Bump.

Here's how to build a simple low-pass filter using a resistor and a capacitor. A low-pass filter, as the name implies, allows signals with low frequencies to pass through but blocks high-frequency signals.

A capacitor with capacitance C has impedance Z = 1/sC, where s is the frequency of the circuit. So, for very high frequencies, Z --> 0 and the capacitor acts as a short circuit. Similarly, for very low frequencies, Z --> infinity and the capacitor acts as an open circuit. To take advantage of this, set up your resistor and capacitor as follows:

Code:
+   --/\/\/\---     +
         R     |
Vin           ---   Vout
           C  ---   
               |
-            ground -


At high frequencies, C will be a short circuit and Vout will be zero. At low frequencies, C will be an open circuit and Vout will equal Vin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lepton
1:41+ Arse Scratcher



PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:57 am    Post subject: 207 Reply with quote

Gravitational Radiation

Maxwell's Equations, which describe electromagnetiism, and Einstein's Equations, which describe general relativity (gravity) have more than a few similiarities. One of the most impressive results from Maxwell's equations is the prediction of a electromagnetic wave that travels at ~300 000 km/s (light!). Well, the equations of general relativity can do the same sorts of things that Maxwell's equations can do, and so there's been speculation for a long time about the possibility of the existence of gravitational radiation.

These gravity waves would contract and expand spacetime itself as they pass. A wave that passes through a yardstick, for example, will enlarge the yardstick in comparison with a nearby yardstick. Incidentally, this is sort of how we are searching for them. The two yardsticks are replaced with two (kilometer-long) laser beams at right angles. When the laser beams are recombined, their relative phase will tell us whether one beam travelled further than the other. There are 4-km-long beams in Washington State and near New Orleans, and 2-km-long beams in Washington State and Pisa, Italy.

However, the process of detecting these waves is very difficult because they are so weak. The best sources would be colliding black holes and neutron stars. We think that, once the current detectors are running at full steam, we should see conclusive evidence of a gravity wave roughly once every few days.

For a phenomenon that hasn't been detected, they are causing a fair bit of exciting (and funding!). One reason for this is the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar. Pulsars are neutron stars that spin extremely fast and with an extremely accurate frequency (better than our best atomic clocks, in some cases). The Hulse-Taylor object is two neutron stars that are spiralling towards each other. As they do this, their frequency is slowing down at exactly the right speed if the energy loss from the system were due to graviational radiation being generated from the system. Pretty strong evidence, imho.

Right now, I am working on a project that involves calculating how effective the gravity wave detectors would be for determining parameters of the sources (ie: neutron star/black hole masses, orbital configuration, distance, etc). The distance is especially important, because the systems that generate gravitational radiation should be visible from extremely far away (since gravity waves don't damp out by intervening matter like light does) and thus the sources of gravitational radiation can be used to determine the evolution of the size of the universe.

If you'd like to hear more, email me or post your questions here. I think it's fascinating stuff, but i suppose that I am biased. =]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
wordcross

<memstat>



PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:22 am    Post subject: 208 Reply with quote

I find the concept fascinating as well, but not being a physicist, i think that this little blurb of yours is about as far as i'd be able to follow you (not to impugne upon your pedagogical abilities, but i'm just not that motivated) Revenge most foul!
_________________
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
kennykiller*
Guest



PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 7:18 am    Post subject: 209 Reply with quote

The word "vitamin" was suggested by the polish biochemist Casimir Funk. It consists of the latin words for life and nitrogenous (vita, amin).
Back to top
alphatango
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 11:14 am    Post subject: 210 Reply with quote

Lepton, I'd be extremely interested in seeing more info and the results of your calculations when you're done. As it happens, I'm currently taking a course on gravitational wave analysis, and I'm presenting a half-hour seminar tomorrow on a relevant paper.

This one's a little more involved than Lepton's description above; I'll try to explain the idea behind the paper in simple terms. Our method of detecting gravitational waves involves a number of test masses and lasers. Because of the size of the effect we're trying to see (very, very small!), we need to worry about something called quantum noise.

This quantum noise (think "quantum mechanics") can be thought of as coming from a few different sources. One of these is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle as applied to the test masses. (This is the one that says we can't know both a particle's position and its momentum to arbitrary precision.) Even though these things have a mass of many kilograms, where we wouldn't normally expect to see quantum effects, the size of the effect we're trying to measure is so small that we have to take the uncertainty introduced by the HUP into account.

Another source of quantum noise is that introduced by lasers, which inherently rely on the principles of quantum mechanics. Now, the interesting thing is this: when you calculate the noise introduced into your measurement from the test masses and the noise introduced by the laser, you get the same expression!

So despite calculating this noise from two completely different sources, we end up with the same answer. The obvious question is whether or not they're actually the same thing. There have been varying opinions on this over the past 30 years or so, but in 2003, a physicist named Vladmir Braginsky published a paper in which he claimed to have finally laid the question to rest. His answer is this: the two are indeed different, and under some circumstances, they can add, but if we're clever, we can design our experiment so that only the noise introduced by the laser affects our experiment, and not that introduced by the quantum mechanical description of the test masses.

I'm not sure how coherent and understandable that description is -- explaining stuff is a skill I'm trying to work on at the moment. Maybe I can clear it up a bit in response to any questions. Felicitous
_________________
"Hanging is too good for a man who makes puns; he should be drawn and quoted." -- Fred Allen

Keeper of the Eternal Flame of the Inner Geek.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lepton*
Guest



PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 3:05 pm    Post subject: 211 Reply with quote

A good description, AT. The workaround for the quantum mechanical noise is absolutely fascinating and rather inspired.

I'm knee-deep in some statistics right now, but I'll let you know if I hit upon anything interesting.
Back to top
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....



PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:51 am    Post subject: 212 Reply with quote

Today I discovered that many English speaking Asians are under the mistaken impression that "prepone" is a word, meaning the opposite of "postpone". Example: "Can we prepone next Friday's meeting to Thursday or Wednesday?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:31 pm    Post subject: 213 Reply with quote

Prepone is a recent inclusion and is now a recognised valid English word.
Encarta wrote:

pre·pone
(past and past participle pre·poned, present participle pre·pon·ing, 3rd person present singular pre·pones)

verb South Asia
Definition:

1. transitive verb bring planned event forward: to arrange for an event to take place earlier than originally planned

2. set for earlier time: to reschedule something for an earlier time or date

[Late 20th century. After postpone]


It's in Dictionary.com too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lepton*
Guest



PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:43 pm    Post subject: 214 Reply with quote

Quote:
Could we prepone the meeting that was scheduled for this afternoon? I'd like to go home at lunch, before the postcipitation starts.
Back to top
wordcross

<memstat>



PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 1:49 am    Post subject: 215 Reply with quote

haha, postcipitation Revenge most foul!
_________________
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Lepton*
Guest



PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 3:30 am    Post subject: 216 Reply with quote

Is no-one else willing to make the joke that only an East-Asian would ever think of "preponing" anything?
Back to top
wordcross

<memstat>



PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 4:25 am    Post subject: 217 Reply with quote

well, they'd have to understand *why* it's a joke to want to post it.... anyone care to fill me in? Confused
_________________
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Lepton*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 5:31 pm    Post subject: 218 Reply with quote

East Asians (especially the Japanese) stereotypically have a strong work ethic.
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:17 am    Post subject: 219 Reply with quote

I actually discovered the alleged word while in a room with about a dozen people, 2/3s Indian. That we (American English speaking people) don't even have a word that's the precise opposite of 'postpone' is perhaps scary.
Back to top
Antrax
ESL Student



PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:26 am    Post subject: 220 Reply with quote

Just found out about this thread. Looks like "just for fun" only with facts. Neat.

It is impossible to write a computer algorithm that receives another computer program and input values to it, and correctly tells you if the program will run forever or not. Assuming such an algorithm exists creates a logical contradiction.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:43 am    Post subject: 221 Reply with quote

The "halting problem." Read that in my discrete math book, pretty cool.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 11:37 am    Post subject: 222 Reply with quote

Antrax wrote:
It is impossible to write a computer algorithm that receives another computer program and input values to it, and correctly tells you if the program will run forever or not. Assuming such an algorithm exists creates a logical contradiction.


A much more general result, which can easily be used to prove the above, and a whole lot more, is Rice's Theorem:

Write any computer program, P, which takes another computer program as input, and returns true or false. Then, either:
a) P always returns true.
b) P always returns false.
c) P will return true for one input program, and false for another, for some pair of programs which compute the same function (i.e. produce the same output whenever given the same input).

What that means, basically, is that if you have in mind some property of functions, you can't write a program that determines if another program computes a function with that property (unless the poperty is "trivial" - true for all functions, or false for all functions). It will sometimes say yes, and sometimes say no, for two programs that compute the same function.
Back to top
Antrax
ESL Student



PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 11:49 am    Post subject: 223 Reply with quote

extro: Kudos. I couldn't find a way to put Rice's theorem into simple words Felicitous
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:17 pm    Post subject: 224 Reply with quote










Antares is the 15th brightest star in the sky. It is more than 1000 light years away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:35 pm    Post subject: 225 Reply with quote

If Earth orbited Antares at the same distance from the surface it orbited the Sun, what would that look like in the sky?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:53 pm    Post subject: 226 Reply with quote

I'd guess black. No atmosphere. (apart from the Sun, which would take up most of the sky during daytime)
The rest of Earth would be black too (once it cools down). *nudge*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:33 pm    Post subject: 227 Reply with quote

Hey, the Sun, Pollux, Arcturus, Betelgeuse, Aldebaran, and Antares are all the same ball!

How much would be "most of the sky"? 99% or more? That's what I'm picturing, and I have no idea if that's right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:25 pm    Post subject: 228 Reply with quote

Courk wrote:
How much would be "most of the sky"? 99% or more? That's what I'm picturing, and I have no idea if that's right.
Our Sun is 32 arc minutes across when viewed from Earth. (i.e. 32/60 degrees)
Antares is approximately 700 times the diameter of our sun.
Distance to Sun is 149 597 870 691 meters (± 30)
Diameter of our sun is 1392000000 meters
The sun is therefore approximately 107 Sun Diameters from Earth.

The formula for calculating the relative size of Antares in the sky is given by:
Tan -1 (700/(2 x 107)) = 73 degrees = approximately 0.4 of the sky.

So not most of the sky after all, in fact not even half.


(Edit: Made a mistake. Correct value 37.45 degrees. See post231)


Last edited by Jack_Ian on Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:17 pm    Post subject: 229 Reply with quote

I've always liked those pics, but from looking at them I've always thought they're really poor quality reproductions (grainy, jpeg artifacts) of some really nice computer graphic originals. Have never been able to find the originals though.
Back to top
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: 230 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:
Courk wrote:
How much would be "most of the sky"? 99% or more? That's what I'm picturing, and I have no idea if that's right.
Our Sun is 32 arc minutes across when viewed from Earth. (i.e. 32/60 degrees)
Antares is approximately 700 times the diameter of our sun.
Distance to Sun is 149 597 870 691 meters (± 30)
Diameter of our sun is 1392000000 meters
The sun is therefore approximately 107 Sun Diameters from Earth.

The formula for calculating the relative size of Antares in the sky is given by:
Tan -1 (700/(2 x 107)) = 73 degrees = approximately 0.4 of the sky.

So not most of the sky after all, in fact not even half.


So, is this 73*60/32 = 136.9 times larger than the sun in the sky?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: 231 Reply with quote

jadesmar wrote:
Jack_Ian wrote:
Courk wrote:
How much would be "most of the sky"? 99% or more? That's what I'm picturing, and I have no idea if that's right.
Our Sun is 32 arc minutes across when viewed from Earth. (i.e. 32/60 degrees)
Antares is approximately 700 times the diameter of our sun.
Distance to Sun is 149 597 870 691 meters (± 30)
Diameter of our sun is 1392000000 meters
The sun is therefore approximately 107 Sun Diameters from Earth.

The formula for calculating the relative size of Antares in the sky is given by:
Tan -1 (700/(2 x 107)) = 73 degrees = approximately 0.4 of the sky.

So not most of the sky after all, in fact not even half.


So, is this 73*60/32 = 136.9 times larger than the sun in the sky?

Actually I made a mistake.
I forgot to take the radius of the star into account.

The correct value should be:
Tan -1 (350/(107 + 350)) = 37.45 degrees

The surface of the star is the same distance away as the edge of our sun but the same can not be said for their centers.

So that makes it (37.45 x 60)/32 = 70 times larger in the sky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:20 pm    Post subject: 232 Reply with quote

The American civil War in 4 minutes

Coke machine Jackpot (I'd love to know if this actually works)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MTGAP
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:23 pm    Post subject: 233 Reply with quote

Courk wrote:
The fifth sense of taste (I can't think of the right word) is umame. It's described as savory.

It's described as what MSG tastes like. Salty is salt, sweet is glucose, bitter is bases, and sour is acids. (Salt is what you get when you mix acids and bases.)

On the topic of senses, people actually have 9 senses, not 5, and arguably have more. Those 9 are smell (chemical reception), sight (electromagnetic wave perception), hearing (sound perception), taste (chemical perception), touch (pressure perception), pain perception, temperature perception, balance perception, and positional perception (where each part of your body is relative to each other part). Possibly categorizable as senses are sense of acceleration and sense of time.
_________________
This statement is false.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MTGAP
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:44 am    Post subject: 234 Reply with quote

L'lanmal wrote:

That's really interesting. I live in the red area and call it soda, and anything else seems really weird to me.
_________________
This statement is false.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MTGAP
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:52 am    Post subject: 235 Reply with quote

rolandofthewhite wrote:
Our psychology teacher made us watch a movie about bonobos. It was basically one giant monkey porn. Melancholy

Once in science class we spent the whole day talking about how different animals have sex. I think dolphins are the most interesting. Dolphins not only pleasure themselves, they have flexible penises and ejaculate after about 12 seconds. (Don't worry–they get multiple ejaculations.)

It's interesting how only relatively intelligent life pleasure themselves. You'd think the intellectuals would do more thinking and less !@#$ing*. But instead, it's just the opposite. Maybe other species aren't clever enough to think of having oral sex.

I feel bad posting three times in a row (and possibly more), but that's what comes from having a really inactive thread.


*that word fit, but I can't bring myself to say it
_________________
This statement is false.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MTGAP
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:55 am    Post subject: 236 Reply with quote

Antares is very big. How big is that compared to the solar system? Like, would it be bigger than Earth's orbit around the sun?
_________________
This statement is false.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Science, Art, and Culture All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3