| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
i_h8_evil_stuff
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
_
Test. Same thing with invizz tags. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucky Wizard
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:26 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
It looks normal to me in Internet Explorer.
Possibly some CSS bug? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CrystyB
Misunderstood Guy
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:16 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
I don't think the problem is from CSS, i think it's from handling incorrect HTML (mismatched closing tags are incorrect...).
Fwiw, neither IE nor Opera have this problem.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
the HTML markup <sometag> <tag2> </sometag> </tag2> is simply incorrect. The behaviour of a browser is undefined in such a situation. This is not a bug. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:25 pm Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| And because IE always chews up HTML code it doesn't really care and handle the situation "correctly" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:38 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| Bad IE!!! *slaps IE with a fish* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:29 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
No no, there is nothing saying that improperly formatted html has to be rejected (unlike XML). So IE handling it without messing things up is just the developers being "nice".
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
test | Dice Roll: | Original Roll String: d20 20-Sided Dice Results: 13 br> | _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
Well, how about that. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
Bug in the dice tag, I'm guessing. I'll look at it. Does it happen with other nested tags?
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
Test.
| jeep wrote: |
Bug in the dice tag, I'm guessing. I'll look at it. Does it happen with other nested tags?
-JEEP |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: 15 |
|
|
| Doesn't happen with quotes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CB*
Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 1:18 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| Speaking of dice tags, could you consider changing the shortcut? Alt+D is the IE + Fx shortcut for the address bar, and some of us use it more often than the dice tags... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 4:57 am Post subject: 17 |
|
|
Why would you access the address bar from the reply screen? _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:01 am Post subject: 18 |
|
|
well, if he's using IE, ctrl+n for new page, which opens the same reply page automatically, then alt+d to access the address bar and navigate wherever he is going.
i don't use the alt+d shortcut, nor do i use IE, but if i did, that might get annoying. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SunnyM
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:26 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| I think it can happen with other nested tags too.. not sure though |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:11 am Post subject: 20 |
|
|
| 2006.... Reply in 2013....? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|